Sujit Choudhry Calls Out Today’s Tough Political Climate

If there is one thing that Sujit Choudhry does not want to see, it would be a democracy in shambles. If there is one thing he has learned in his many years as a constitutional scholar, it would be the fact that there are a number of boundaries that should not be crossed. Sujit Choudhry is fond of calling these boundaries an “absolute red line” if they are crossed. In a nutshell, Crossing them in the United States or in any other country could prompt a serious constitutional crisis. He know it’s a number of current examples.

The most glaring one would be and the current administration, and he is writing in response to a tweet from Attorney General Eric Holder, from the last Administration. Of course, president Trump has considered firing Robert Mueller for his investigation into Russian interference. Obama’s Attorney General and many others will leave that this would be one of those red lines that should never be crossed. For more of his published works, visit

Sujit Choudhry calls this potential red line a focal point. He said that Eric Holder’s tweet represents a focal point in that Mueller and others are meant to be a check on limitless political power, whether you agree with the premise or not. Choudhry also notes how interesting it is that Holder does not even mention the possibility of challenging Mueller’s authority at all. He seems fine with allowing Mueller to do his job until he himself feels there is nothing left to investigate.

Of course, there are other areas where Sujit Choudhry notes the existence of such a red line. One example that could potentially occur in the United States would be a president attempting to go further than two terms. Choudhry notes that any president that attempted to stay longer then two terms – even through declaring a national emergency – would be yet again crossing one of these all too important red lines. Finally, the other areas where this constitutional law scholar notes that would be a red line would be a simple coup d’etat here in the United States. There is no doubt that we live in interesting times indeed.

Learn more about Sujit on

Connect with Sujit on Facebook, Crunchbase

Sujit Choudhry is Disintegrating Eric Holder’s Tweet among Others

We all know that the constitution is a leading aspect in ensuring that the rule of law is observed and adhered to. However, people tend to misinterpret the constitution at times. Even so, there are a few people like Sujit Choudhry who have a vast understanding of the institution making process and its diverse application. Moreover, Sujit is always committed to understanding the comparative law and its use in different countries. Being a legal expert, he has attracted many states to his service provision docket. Consequently, Sujit Choudhry addresses multiple issues encompassing law and its relevant application.

 A Look at his Areas of Specialization

Being a qualified law expert in many areas, Sujit Choudhry uses his expertise in offering actual law services like designing the constitution with the sole intention of making sure that issues are resolved within a specified time (  More than that, he has mastered the art of applying this same knowledge on various societies that need the same help when it comes to problem-solving. Since he is a significant contributor to matters of the constitution, Sujit Choudhry has learned the benefits of utilizing his knowledge in constitutional law to help citizens in understanding the impact of politics in communities, check

Sujit Choudhry Shares his Observations on Eric Holder’s Tweet.

With the advent of social media use in the world, people have majorly capitalized on the use of various networking tools to monitor the political climate of their countries. Recently, Eric Holder posted an issue regarding the dismissal of Robert Muller and its impact on the community citing that if anything happens to him, citizens should take off to the streets in search of justice. Regarding this, Sujit Choudhry stated that he was perplexed by Eric Holder’s character because as far as he is concerned, Holder is a qualified law expert who applies his skills and wealth of knowledge in determining the consequences of people’s actions. In other words, he should be courageous enough to pick the fight in a lawsuit. Further terming it as a red line, Sujit Choudhry goes on to insist that it is upon Americans to determine the case and the relevant action that should be taken against the whole scenario.


With the constitution as the significant democratic aspect of the country, it is relevant for Sujit Choudhry to express his sentiments formally. That is precisely what he has done. Other than that, he is a revered constitutionalist who dedicates time to making sure that the people understand the value of addressing situations subtly.

Keep up with Choudhry on Crunchbase

Sujit Choudhry and Holder’s “Red Line”

It is no secret and should come as no surprise to anyone who avidly follows current geopolitical developments that there has been a growing sense of skepticism surrounding democracy. Democracy, in its modern iterations, being a relatively new form of governance, caused massive social upheavals but brought with it a transformative power which gave the citizenry of the countries where it took root a newfound sense of political agency; no longer where they merely powerless onlookers but instead were active participants in the grand machinery of their state or countries order. However, countries such as Poland and Hungary have grown doubtful about the efficacy surrounding democratic politics, specifically, liberal, constitutional democracies.

Sujit Choudhry, a professor of comparative constitutional law and prolific writer (, has been more vocal than almost anyone in defending constitutional democracy from its critics and he recently turned his considerable and scholarly prowess towards a unlikely source, a tweet that is a message on the social media platform, (Twitter) written by Obama era, former attorney general, Eric Holder.

The tweet Mr. Choudhry focuses in on was written amidst the Mueller investigation which concerned whether or not President Trump had colluded with Russian governmental agents during the 2016 elections, check Holder had written, in 2017, that any potential move to fire Special Counsel Mueller was a “absolute red line” which should not be crossed and that if it were, the American people would decide what measures should be taken to remedy it.

More of Sujit’s works at

In Choudhry’s interpretation, he notes that Holder’s message was based off of symbolic concepts, the first and most obvious being the allusion to a “red line” the breaking out of the bounds of the constitution which would prove deleterious to American democratic order. The second being that in leaving the decision up to the “American people” Holder demonstrates an adherence to the very American tradition of self-reliant constitutional governance, a fierce streak of independence which Choudhry realizes as the focal point of America’s self-conception of government.